Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 03:56

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Quasi consequatur unde doloremque saepe ut veritatis.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Meteor Activity Outlook for June 7-13, 2025 - American Meteor Society
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Michaels buys Joann brand, plans to expand crafting supply to meet demand - ABC News
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Scarlet & Violet—Destined Rivals Triple Play: Trainer’s Pokémon - Pokemon.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Mysterious fast radio burst turns out to be from long-dead NASA satellite - Phys.org
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Lawsuit says mayor called people who opposed Buc-ee's project 'terrorists' - 9News